1-25

9
Interpretation 9

Normal


25
25 Interpretation

Antidromic SVT in WPW – although without the history of WPW, we could not have known that at the bedside. Other possibilities are SVT with aberancy, and VT.

26

This is the same patient as in the prior ECG after cardioversion. Notice the prominent delta waves in V3, V4, and V5 along with the short PR interval. This is WPW, which makes the prior ECG likely to be antidromic SVT.


49
49 Interpretation

VT

50

Same patient as the prior ECG after cardioversion. No ischemic changes noted.


64
64 Interpretation

VT


60
60 Interpretation

Mobitz 1 AV block (Wenchebach)


16
16 Interpretation

RBBB with left axis deviation = bifasicular block: RBBB + anterior hemiblock


4
4 Interpretation

RBBB


47
47 Interpretation

Brugada Pattern


45
45 Interpretation

Down in 1, up in R. This is concerning for limb lead misplacement

46

Same patient as ECG 45, now with the leads in the proper position. Up in lead I, and down in aVR is much more likely to be the accurate reading.


5
5 Interpretation

Normal


17
17 Interpretation

Normal


66
66 Interpretation

66: STE in the anterior leads with reciprocal depression in the inferior leads


20
20 Interpretation

Normal


21
21 Interpretation

Normal sinus with PAC’s. the finding is how tall the P waves are in lead II. They are uniphasic. Since the right atrium depolarizes before the left, tall uniphasic P waves in lead II are caused by hypertophy of the right atrium. (Biphasic P waves are caused by left atrial enlargement). Right atrial enlargement is likely due to pathology of the tricuspid valve or high RV pressures, which themselves are usually due to high pulmonary aretery pressures.


6
6 Interpretation

Atrial sensed, ventricular paced rhythm


36
36 Interpretation

Mobitz 1 AV block (Wenchebach)


32
32 Interpretation

STE in V5 and V6. It looks unusual because ischemic STE is not usually seen after an S wave as it here. Another interesting point on this ekg is a PVC visible in leads V1-3. The PVC shows concordant ST depression in leads V2 and V3. That would meet Sgarbossa crieteria for an acute MI in the setting of LBBB. I don’t think that has been specifically shown to apply to PVCs, but I don’t know for sure. It’s concerning.


37
37 Interpretation

STE in the inferior leads with reciprocal depression in the anterior leads. Of note, not all inferior STE will show reciprocal depression.


42
42 Interpretation

STE in the anterior and lateral leads with reciprocal depression in the inferior leads. Of note, there is no elevation in V3. The only explanation is lead malpositioning. Unfortunately it is common to see lead V3 placed to the patient’s right of V2, that must be what happened here.


1
1 Interpretation

Normal


56
56 Interpretation

WPW. short PR with delta waves clearly visible in leads V1-V4.


59
59 Interpretation

STE elevation in the inferior leads. STE greater in lead III than lead II as well as STE in V1 (both highly suggestive of right ventricular involvment). Mobitz 2 AV block.